My GAME plan is running smoothly to
some degree. We have encountered a handful of issues, but I have been
discussing what has been happening with other teachers in my department. I
believe I have discovered some ways to cope with certain issues and replace
others.
There are two modifications that I
just realized I will need to make this week. The first pertains to student
blogging. Blogs for individuals, such as those we create for Walden, are
excellent tools for students to use in developing their own voice. The major
issue, however, is time management for me. If I use the format that I
originally intended, which was modeled after the classes I have been taking in
this program, I will have over one hundred separate blogs to visit. If I add
the component we use in this course, which is to have students submit a
separate file with their posts and responses, I will create a huge rift with my
students. Many are not to that level responsibility and maturity yet, and I
believe much of the work with the blogs would not be done well if done at all.
I must also take some of the blame. Teachers must prepare the technology, make
sure the correct resources are available, and are working properly (Cennamo,
Ross & Ertmer, 2009). I did not do this, and instead relied on what I
thought I knew from my experience last year. Therefore, I have decided to
create a single blog for each of my three senior classes. I have gathered each
student's school Gmail address, and I will send them all invitations to the
blog. Doing this, I can have the writing prompt as the initial post on the
blog, and their responses can be placed in the comment section. This will allow
for a number of things to occur. Students will be able to see what others are
writing which can help clarify the purpose, open up new possibilities for
understanding through collaborative thinking, and develop conversation on the
topic we are engaging.
The second modification is very
similar to the first, yet it pertains to wikis. I believe we would have had
more success with the group wikis in the classroom, but I would have still had
at least a dozen different projects to evaluate. If I am to address both
individual and group learning, it will be difficult to judge at this time as I
am still wrapping my mind around this process. As my understanding evolves, I
can broaden the scope of future projects. For now, one wiki per class will
allow for student creativity and collaboration without developing a difficult
monitoring situation for me. The pieces of the wiki can still be divided among
smaller groups, each with their own group leader. These could be the students
with editing rights to the blog. This would be even more powerful in that these
group leaders could also be a group, perhaps made of students that on the
higher end of the ability spectrum. If there are students who are ahead of the
game, then adding in a layer of responsibility that will push their thinking
can account for that differentiation piece that will be important to keep them
engaged.
All the information and resources
are at my fingertips. The biggest struggle has been using the technology tools.
Each student has been assigned a Netbook, but our corporation micromanages web
access to the point that we are never sure what we will be able to do from day
to day. For example, YouTube is available to all on some days, only teachers
with their school account on others, and there are even days when it is blocked
completely. Our LightSpeed software, which is the Internet security software we
have pre-installed on all computers in the corporation, is excellent when used
correctly, but if people are not careful, it could hinder access to the point
that students no longer want anything to do with the provided technology due to
absolute frustration. I do have options, and the first one that I intend to
look into is developing a list of need sites for my class. I have been told
that if I do this, I should be able to make sure that the sites we need will
not be blocked at any point.
The biggest lesson I have learned:
Nothing is as simple as it originally seems, and the worst thing I can do as a
teacher is start out with a big idea and not break it down into manageable
pieces. I have some amazing ideas sometimes. But I have to make them manageable
or they are merely unachieved dreams. In the future, I have much to do to
improve. It is important that expectations are clear from day one, all
objectives are stated along with the evaluation methods, and students need to
be actively involved in the development of their learning (Han &
Bhattacharya, 2001). I have the tendency to think things are obvious, and I
omit things that are necessary. In addition to tackling the issues with
technology, I must be more intentional. If I am, I believe I will find greater
levels of success and so will my students.
References
Cennamo, K., Ross,
J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom
use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Han, S., and Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism,
Learning by Design, and Project Based Learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging
perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved September 29,
2012, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt